Rapid
Performance Improvement (RPI)
How
does RPI compare to SEI's IDEAL® Model for Change?
SEI's model for change
has been the software industry's standard description for developing
improvement strategies. That is why we have choosen this model
to compare and contrast how RPI is different.
|
IDEAL®
Model
|
RPI
MethodologyT
|
| Assessments are
used up front as a diagnostic for future change |
Assessments are
used to validate deployment progress |
| Scope of an iteration
includes both pilots and institutionalization |
Scope of an iteration
might be a pilot effort or organization-wide |
| Long deployment
cycles means delayed feedback and learning about improvements |
Short deployment
iterations achieve results quickly and emphasize feedback
and learning |
| Compliance process-driven
approach |
Explicit support
for performance-based improvement |
| Emphasis on process
modelers and owners means extensive improvement staffing:
management steering committees (MSCs), process groups (SEPGs),
technical working groups (TWGs), process owners, etc. |
Emphasis is on
RPI Facilitators to steward and guide improvement (rather
than own it) means minimal process improvement infrastructure
and lower overhead costs |
| Used with a single
standard/model (typically CMM or CMMI) |
Support for multiple
standards/ models (CMMI, ISO, FDA) |
® - IDEAL
is a registered trademark of Carnegie Mellon University.
T - RPI Methodology is a trademark
of RPI Alliance Ltd.
|
RPI News & Events
Version
2 of RPI Methodology
now includes reference processes for SW-CMM(sm), CMMI(sm), and
TPI(R). It also includes an SEI ARC Class C compliant appraisal
method and is compliant with CMMI OPF and OPD.
Read Testimonials
Read the testimonials of some of our clients by clicking here.
® CMM
and CMMI are service marks of Carnegie Mellon University.
TPI
is a registered trademark of Sogeti.
|